Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Vince Chadwick's avatar

So you are advocating yet MORE money for transport in London! You point out that London "generates a far higher GDP per head than any other region". There's a reason for that - it gets the required infrastructure investment!

Unlike the rest of Europe, the UK is 'capital centric', and to a very marked degree. We need infrastructure investment elsewhere to change that - HS2 was going to be one such enabler, but that has withered on the vine. The elephant in the railway room at present is the gap between Handsacre where HS2 will terminate in a Staffordshire field (where WCML + HS2 means a 6-line railway becomes 2 line with flat junctions at Colwich and Stafford!), and Crewe, where it would link the rest of the country to the high speed spine.

Ni Pen's avatar

UK will not achieve its potential without addressing transport in all the areas where it constrains success and growth. We must stop being drawn into the spurious argument around competing demands on constrained/capped funding and focus on all proposals which deliver “local” benefit to our economy.

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?